Battered white fish fillets vs Fish Sticks
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Battered white fish fillets | Fish Sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 199 kcal | 203 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fish Sticks has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Battered white fish fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fish Sticks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Battered white fish fillets
Alaska Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) (Fish) (53%), Fortified Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin (B3), Thiamin (B1)], Rapeseed Oil, Water, Wheat Starch, Maize Flour, Raising Agents (Diphosphates, Sodium Carbonates), Salt, Dextrose, Sunflower Oil, Yeast Extract, Garlic Powder, Onion Powder, Black Pepper.
Fish Sticks
Colin d'Alaska (poisson) 65%, chapelure 16% (farine de blé, eau, épices, levure), huile de colza, farine de blé, amidon de pomme de terre, eau, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Battered white fish fillets or Fish Sticks?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Battered white fish fillets has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Battered white fish fillets has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.