Battered fishless fillets vs Plant-Based F'sh Filets
Overall, Plant-Based F'sh Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Battered fishless fillets
Plant-Based F'sh Filets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Battered fishless fillets | Plant-Based F'sh Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 11.3 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 12 | 10 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Plant-Based F'sh Filets has 36% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Plant-Based F'sh Filets has 45% less fat (6.3 g vs 11.3 g).
- Plant-Based F'sh Filets has no saturated fat, while Battered fishless fillets has 2.1 g.
- Plant-Based F'sh Filets has no sugar, while Battered fishless fillets has 2.7 g.
- Battered fishless fillets has 27% more fiber (4.3 g vs 3.1 g).
- Plant-Based F'sh Filets has 42% more protein (9.4 g vs 5.4 g).
Ingredients
Battered fishless fillets
Young Jackfruit (28%), Water, Wheat Flour, Fully Refined Soya Bean Oil, King Oyster Mushroom (8%), Potato (7%), Corn Starch, Soya Protein, Tapioca Starch, Yeast Extract, Potato Starch, Vegetable Fibre, Salt, Rice Flour, Granulated Sugar, Rice Starch, Raising Agents: Sodium Bicarbonate, Calcium Phosphate, Disodium Diphosphate, Calcium Carbonate; Pineapple, Stabilisers: Methyl Cellulose, Carboxymethylcellulose; Natural Flavouring, Dextrose, White Pepper, Shiitake Mushroom, Citrus Fibre, Garlic, Onion, Onion Powder, Seaweed, Soya Bean, Yeast, Colours: Curcumin, Beta-carotene; Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid; Thickener: Xanthan Gum.
Plant-Based F'sh Filets
WATER, CANOLA OIL, TEXTURED VEGETABLE PROTEIN PRODUCT (SOY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE. TITANIUM DIOXIDE [COLOR]), ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), 2% OR LESS OF: POTATO STARCH, TAPIOCA STARCH, METHYLCELLULOSE, SALT, YEAST EXTRACT, DEGERMINATED YELLOW CORN FLOUR, NATURAL FLAVORS, ONION POWDER, GARLIC POWDER, LEAVENING (SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, SODIUM BICARBONATE, MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE), SUNFLOWER OIL, WHEAT GLUTEN, PAPRIKA, DHA ALGAL OIL, AUTOLYZED YEAST EXTRACT, SPICE, SOY FLOUR, XANTHAN GUM, SUGAR, CITRIC ACID, SOYBEAN OIL, TURMERIC. CONTAINS: SOY, WHEAT.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Battered fishless fillets or Plant-Based F'sh Filets?
Overall, Plant-Based F'sh Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Plant-Based F'sh Filets has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Plant-Based F'sh Filets has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.