Barres au son d'avoine vs Raw bat
Overall, Barres au son d'avoine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barres au son d'avoine | Raw bat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 387 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Barres au son d'avoine has 29% less fat (10 g vs 14 g).
- Barres au son d'avoine has 59% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Barres au son d'avoine has 98% less sugar (0.9 g vs 40 g).
- Raw bat has 30% more fiber (10 g vs 7 g).
- Barres au son d'avoine has 31% more protein (12 g vs 8.3 g).
- Barres au son d'avoine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Barres au son d'avoine lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Barres au son d'avoine
Son d'avoine 40% - édulcorant: sirop de maltitol - flocons d'avoine complet 9,3% - amandes grillées hachées 5,5% protéines de soja - huile de tournesol - farine de riz - fibres d'avoine 1,1% - extrait de malt d'orge - antioxydant : extrait riche en tocophérols - émulsifiant : lécithines de soja - sel - arôme naturel_Traces de lait, arachides et autres fruits à coque.
Raw bat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barres au son d'avoine or Raw bat?
Overall, Barres au son d'avoine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Barres au son d'avoine has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Barres au son d'avoine has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 40 g per 100 g.