Comparison

Raw bat vs Granola bars

Overall, Raw bat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRaw batGranola bars
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 387 kcal 436 kcal
Fat 14 g 17.5 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 2.6 g
Sugars 40 g 35 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 10 g —
Protein 8.3 g 9 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedPeanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Raw bat has 11% fewer calories (387 kcal vs 436 kcal).
  • Raw bat has 20% less fat (14 g vs 17.5 g).
  • Granola bars has 13% less sugar (35 g vs 40 g).
  • Only Granola bars lists: Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Raw bat

Not available.

Granola bars

cacahouètes grillées 25,6 %, raisins séchés 14,6% (raisins 99,5 %, huile de tournesol), sirop de sucre inverti, flocons de riz et de ma e), riz extrudé (riz 93 %, sucre de canne, sel comestible), sirop de maltose, myrtilles sucrées 6% (myrtilles 78 %, sucre, fructose, huile de tou e végétale (huile de palme RSPO, huile de karité, émulsifiant: lécithine de tournesol), émulsifiant: lécithine de soja, arôme naturel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Raw bat or Granola bars?

Overall, Raw bat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Raw bat has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 436 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Granola bars has less sugar: 35 g versus 40 g per 100 g.

More comparisons