Une barre aux fruit secs vs Raw bat
Overall, Raw bat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Une barre aux fruit secs | Raw bat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 451 kcal | 387 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 29 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Raw bat has 14% fewer calories (387 kcal vs 451 kcal).
- Raw bat has 36% less fat (14 g vs 22 g).
- Raw bat has 16% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- Une barre aux fruit secs has 28% less sugar (29 g vs 40 g).
- Raw bat has 54% more fiber (10 g vs 4.6 g).
- Une barre aux fruit secs has 36% more protein (13 g vs 8.3 g).
- Only Une barre aux fruit secs lists: Nuts, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Une barre aux fruit secs
_Cacahuètes_ 27%, raisins sec 24% (raisins sec, huile de tournesol), _Amandes_ 15% sirop de glucose, riz soufflé (riz, sucre), miel, abricots secs 4% (abricots, farine de riz).
Raw bat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Une barre aux fruit secs or Raw bat?
Overall, Raw bat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Raw bat has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 451 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Une barre aux fruit secs has less sugar: 29 g versus 40 g per 100 g.