Baking powder double acting vs Baking Powder
Overall, Baking powder double acting has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking powder double acting | Baking Powder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 25 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Baking powder double acting
corn starch, sodium bicarbonate, sodium aluminum sulfate, monocalcium phosphate
Baking Powder
Sodium acid pyrophosphate, sodium bicarbonate, corn starch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking powder double acting or Baking Powder?
Overall, Baking powder double acting has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking powder double acting has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking powder double acting has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.