Baking powder double acting vs Royal Baking Powder 450G
Overall, Royal Baking Powder 450G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking powder double acting | Royal Baking Powder 450G |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 25 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Royal Baking Powder 450G has no salt, while Baking powder double acting has 25 g.
- Royal Baking Powder 450G has the better Nutri-Score.
- Baking powder double acting is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Baking powder double acting
corn starch, sodium bicarbonate, sodium aluminum sulfate, monocalcium phosphate
Royal Baking Powder 450G
Raising agents (disodium diphosphate, sodium hydrogen corn starch. May contain milk. Product without Gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking powder double acting or Royal Baking Powder 450G?
Overall, Royal Baking Powder 450G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking powder double acting has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking powder double acting has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.