Baba Ganoush vs Hummus de berenjena con tahini
Overall, Baba Ganoush has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Baba Ganoush
Hummus de berenjena con tahini
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baba Ganoush | Hummus de berenjena con tahi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baba Ganoush has 67% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 255 kcal).
- Baba Ganoush has 75% less fat (6.2 g vs 25 g).
- Baba Ganoush has 63% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Baba Ganoush has 37% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Hummus de berenjena con tahini has 39% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Baba Ganoush has 23% more protein (3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Baba Ganoush has the better Nutri-Score.
- Baba Ganoush is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Baba Ganoush
Aubergine 83%, crème de sésame 9%, poivrons rouges grillés de Florina 5%, ail, sel. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œuf, soja, céleri, graines de moutarde, fruits à coque et poisson.
Hummus de berenjena con tahini
Berenjenas 47%, agua, aceite de girasol, tahini 5,8% (pasta de _sésamo_), zumo de limón, aceite de oliva, azúcar moreno de caña, ajo, sal, aroma natural.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baba Ganoush or Hummus de berenjena con tahini?
Overall, Baba Ganoush has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baba Ganoush has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baba Ganoush has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.