Comparison

Baba Ganoush vs Caviar d'aubergine

Overall, Caviar d'aubergine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBaba GanoushCaviar d'aubergine
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 179 kcal 121 kcal
Fat 16.3 g 10.7 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 1.3 g
Sugars 3.1 g 4.5 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 5.5 g 1.3 g
Protein 0.5 g 1.1 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedEggs, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caviar d'aubergine has 32% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 179 kcal).
  • Caviar d'aubergine has 34% less fat (10.7 g vs 16.3 g).
  • Baba Ganoush has 31% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Caviar d'aubergine has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Baba Ganoush has 77% more fiber (5.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Caviar d'aubergine has 55% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Caviar d'aubergine lists: Eggs, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Baba Ganoush

eau, 34% aubergine grillée, huile de navette, vinaigre, sirop de glucose-fructose, sel, amidon modifié (maïs), épaississants: gomme xanthane, gomme guar; jaune d'oeuf, harissa (piment rouge, ail, coriandre, sel, carvi), acidifiant: acide citrique; poivre, ail, sucre, farine de moutarde, conservateur: sorbate de potassium; arôme naturel d'œuf, romarin, origan

Caviar d'aubergine

Aubergines (30%), oignon (20%), huile de Soja, sucre, eau, sel, poivre noir, vinaigre, mayonnaise, œufs, Conservateurs (E202) (E211). Stabilisateur (E415).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Baba Ganoush or Caviar d'aubergine?

Overall, Caviar d'aubergine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caviar d'aubergine has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baba Ganoush has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons