Avena soffiata vs Gepofte haver ongezoet
Overall, Avena soffiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Avena soffiata | Gepofte haver ongezoet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 391 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 7.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Avena soffiata has 27% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Gepofte haver ongezoet has 45% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Avena soffiata has 25% more fiber (8 g vs 6 g).
Ingredients
Avena soffiata
Not available.
Gepofte haver ongezoet
100 % biologische haver
FAQ
Which is healthier: Avena soffiata or Gepofte haver ongezoet?
Overall, Avena soffiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gepofte haver ongezoet has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gepofte haver ongezoet has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.