Asda chicken paste vs Garam Masala Paste
Overall, Asda chicken paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Asda chicken paste | Garam Masala Paste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 213 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 11.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garam Masala Paste has 31% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 213 kcal).
- Garam Masala Paste has 21% less fat (11.9 g vs 15 g).
- Garam Masala Paste has 59% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 4.4 g).
- Asda chicken paste has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Asda chicken paste has no salt, while Garam Masala Paste has 4.5 g.
- Asda chicken paste has 81% more protein (15 g vs 2.8 g).
- Asda chicken paste has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Asda chicken paste
chicken water soya protein chicken fat potato starch salt yeast extract black pepper sugar chicory fibre cornflour onion extract
Garam Masala Paste
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Asda chicken paste or Garam Masala Paste?
Overall, Asda chicken paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garam Masala Paste has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 213 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Asda chicken paste has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.