Comparison

Alesto Cashew Erdnuss Mix, Hot Chili vs Roasted & Salted Peanuts

Overall, Roasted & Salted Peanuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlesto Cashew Erdnuss Mix, H...Roasted & Salted Peanuts
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 612 kcal 645 kcal
Fat 49.9 g 53.4 g
Saturated fat 8.4 g 7.7 g
Sugars 5.9 g 4.5 g
Salt 1.6 g 0.9 g
Fiber 3.1 g 5.8 g
Protein 21 g 28.6 g
Additives20
AllergensNuts, PeanutsPeanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Roasted & Salted Peanuts has 24% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Roasted & Salted Peanuts has 44% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Roasted & Salted Peanuts has 47% more fiber (5.8 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Roasted & Salted Peanuts has 27% more protein (28.6 g vs 21 g).
  • Roasted & Salted Peanuts has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Roasted & Salted Peanuts is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Alesto Cashew Erdnuss Mix, Hot Chili lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Alesto Cashew Erdnuss Mix, Hot Chili

45% noix de cajou, 45% cacahuètes, huiles végétales (palme, tournesol), sel de cuisine, épices, sucre, extrait de levure, oignon en poudre, arôme, ail en poudre, 0,2% piment fort, colorant: extrait de paprika; acidifiant: acide citrique. Peut contenir des traces d'autres fruits à coque (noix).

Roasted & Salted Peanuts

Peanut, Rapeseed Oil, Salt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alesto Cashew Erdnuss Mix, Hot Chili or Roasted & Salted Peanuts?

Overall, Roasted & Salted Peanuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alesto Cashew Erdnuss Mix, Hot Chili has fewer calories: 612 kcal versus 645 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roasted & Salted Peanuts has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons