Comparison
Ail vs Ail & Romarin
Overall, Ail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ail | Ail & Romarin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 2 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 822 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 91 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ail has 64% fewer calories (300 kcal vs 822 kcal).
- Ail has 78% less fat (20 g vs 91 g).
- Ail has 71% less saturated fat (4 g vs 14 g).
- Ail has 100% more protein (4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Ail
Not available.
Ail & Romarin
Huile d'olive vierge extra biologique (99.74). agrôme naturel d'ail et romarin (0,3%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ail or Ail & Romarin?
Overall, Ail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ail has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 822 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ail has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.