Comparison

5% Fat British Pork Mince vs Trita di suino

Overall, 5% Fat British Pork Mince has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient5% Fat British Pork MinceTrita di suino
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 144 kcal 146 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 7.9 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 28.2 g 20.7 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 56% less fat (3.5 g vs 7.9 g).
  • 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Trita di suino has no sugar, while 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 0.5 g.
  • 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 27% more protein (28.2 g vs 20.7 g).
  • 5% Fat British Pork Mince has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

5% Fat British Pork Mince

Pork mince.

Trita di suino

CARNE DI SUINO 98,896 (ORIGINE: ITALIA), SALE, ANTIOSSIDANTE: E300.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 5% Fat British Pork Mince or Trita di suino?

Overall, 5% Fat British Pork Mince has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

5% Fat British Pork Mince has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trita di suino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons