5% Fat British Pork Mince vs Trita di suino
Overall, 5% Fat British Pork Mince has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 5% Fat British Pork Mince | Trita di suino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 28.2 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 56% less fat (3.5 g vs 7.9 g).
- 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Trita di suino has no sugar, while 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 0.5 g.
- 5% Fat British Pork Mince has 27% more protein (28.2 g vs 20.7 g).
- 5% Fat British Pork Mince has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
5% Fat British Pork Mince
Pork mince.
Trita di suino
CARNE DI SUINO 98,896 (ORIGINE: ITALIA), SALE, ANTIOSSIDANTE: E300.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 5% Fat British Pork Mince or Trita di suino?
Overall, 5% Fat British Pork Mince has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
5% Fat British Pork Mince has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trita di suino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.