Schweinehackfleisch / Viande hachée de porc vs Trita di suino
Overall, Trita di suino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schweinehackfleisch / Viande... | Trita di suino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 248 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trita di suino has 41% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 248 kcal).
- Trita di suino has 56% less fat (7.9 g vs 18 g).
- Trita di suino has 68% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 7.7 g).
- Trita di suino has 18% more protein (20.7 g vs 17 g).
- Trita di suino has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schweinehackfleisch / Viande hachée de porc
100% Schweinefleisch 4.98€/kg
Trita di suino
CARNE DI SUINO 98,896 (ORIGINE: ITALIA), SALE, ANTIOSSIDANTE: E300.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schweinehackfleisch / Viande hachée de porc or Trita di suino?
Overall, Trita di suino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trita di suino has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 248 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schweinehackfleisch / Viande hachée de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.