Hakket grisekød 14-18% fedt vs Trita di suino
Overall, Trita di suino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hakket grisekød 14-18% fedt | Trita di suino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 219 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trita di suino has 33% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 219 kcal).
- Trita di suino has 51% less fat (7.9 g vs 16 g).
- Trita di suino has 58% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 5.9 g).
- Trita di suino has 13% more protein (20.7 g vs 18 g).
- Trita di suino has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hakket grisekød 14-18% fedt
Hakket grisekød
Trita di suino
CARNE DI SUINO 98,896 (ORIGINE: ITALIA), SALE, ANTIOSSIDANTE: E300.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hakket grisekød 14-18% fedt or Trita di suino?
Overall, Trita di suino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trita di suino has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 219 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hakket grisekød 14-18% fedt has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.