Comparison
Trita di suino vs Mleté mäso mix (max. 35% tuku)
Overall, Trita di suino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trita di suino | Mleté mäso mix (max. 35% tuk... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 146 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trita di suino has 58% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Trita di suino has 75% less fat (7.9 g vs 32 g).
- Trita di suino has 83% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Trita di suino has 28% more protein (20.7 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Trita di suino
CARNE DI SUINO 98,896 (ORIGINE: ITALIA), SALE, ANTIOSSIDANTE: E300.
Mleté mäso mix (max. 35% tuku)
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trita di suino or Mleté mäso mix (max. 35% tuku)?
Overall, Trita di suino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trita di suino has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trita di suino has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Beef & Pork Mince vs Mleté mäso mix (max. 35%...
5% Fat British Pork Minc... vs Trita di suino
5% Fat British Pork Minc... vs Mleté mäso mix (max. 35%...
Schweinehackfleisch / Vi... vs Trita di suino
Hakket grisekød 14-18% f... vs Trita di suino
Outdoor Bred Pork Mince... vs Trita di suino
Schweinehackfleisch / Vi... vs Mleté mäso mix (max. 35%...
Hakket grisekød 14-18% f... vs Mleté mäso mix (max. 35%...