Comparison
100% Cevada vs Byggryn hele
Overall, Byggryn hele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 100% Cevada | Byggryn hele |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 334 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Byggryn hele has 14% fewer calories (334 kcal vs 390 kcal).
- 100% Cevada has 95% less fat (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- 100% Cevada has no saturated fat, while Byggryn hele has 0.4 g.
- Byggryn hele has 31% more fiber (10 g vs 6.9 g).
- Byggryn hele has 22% more protein (8.7 g vs 6.8 g).
Ingredients
100% Cevada
Cevada, cevada malteada
Byggryn hele
_Bygg_
FAQ
Which is healthier: 100% Cevada or Byggryn hele?
Overall, Byggryn hele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Byggryn hele has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
100% Cevada has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.