Nutrition report ready

Trancio di prosciutto crudo

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score C

View details

Trancio di prosciutto crudo

in Hams Barcode 2208531011870
Average nutritional quality

Trancio di prosciutto crudo provides 234 kcal per 100 g, with 0.1 g of sugars and 27 g of protein. That is 88% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Hams category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
16 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
4.9 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.1 g · Low
Salt
0.8 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 234 kcal 169 +38%
Total fat 16 g 8.1 +97%
Saturated fat 4.9 g 3 +62%
Carbohydrates 0.5 g 1.5 −67%
Total sugars 0.1 g 0.8 −88%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0.3 −100%
Protein 27 g 22.4 +20%
Salt 0.8 g 3.1 −75%

Category average across 1904 Hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other hams

Calories higher 20%
Sugars lower 13%
Salt lower 3%
Saturated fat higher 20%
Protein top 22%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No preservatives
Sold in
Italy
Barcode
2208531011870

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Trancio di prosciutto crudo?

Trancio di prosciutto crudo contains 234 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Trancio di prosciutto crudo?

Trancio di prosciutto crudo has 0.1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Trancio di prosciutto crudo healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Trancio di prosciutto crudo? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More hams

View all →