View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Tapas pommes parisiennes
Pommes parisiennes avec pelure et à l'huile aux fines herbes
Tapas pommes parisiennes by PolderGoud provides 102 kcal per 100 g, with 0.7 g of sugars and 1.4 g of protein. That is 68% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Tapas category and comes in a 450 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 102 kcal | 234 −56% |
| Total fat | 3.5 g | 16.9 −79% |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 4.5 −91% |
| Carbohydrates | 15 g | 8.2 +84% |
| Total sugars | 0.7 g | 2.2 −68% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.6 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 1.8 g | 1.8 |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 11.8 −88% |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.7 −71% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 133 Tapas products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other tapas
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
pommes de terre 93%, huile végétale 6%, mélange herbes et épices 1%
Product details
- Quantity
- 450 g
- Sold in
- Belgium
- Barcode
- 8716447002171
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Tapas pommes parisiennes?
Tapas pommes parisiennes contains 102 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Tapas pommes parisiennes?
Tapas pommes parisiennes has 0.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Tapas pommes parisiennes healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 31, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More tapas
View all →
d NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 