No Pork Streaky Bacon

by Marks & Spencer in Meat analogues Barcode 29137770
Poor nutritional quality

No Pork Streaky Bacon by Marks & Spencer provides 199 kcal per 100 g, with 1.2 g of sugars and 10 g of protein. That is 45% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Meat analogues category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
12.7 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
1.5 g · Low
Sugars
1.2 g · Low
Salt
2.1 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 199 kcal 204
Total fat 12.7 g 10 +27%
Saturated fat 1.5 g 1.8 −16%
Carbohydrates 6.8 g 11.6 −41%
Total sugars 1.2 g 2.2 −45%
Protein 10 g 15.2 −34%
Salt 2.1 g 1.5 +36%

Category average across 2795 Meat analogues products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meat analogues

Calories lower 49%
Sugars lower 44%
Salt higher 17%
Saturated fat higher 36%
Protein top 73%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Ingredient list not available.

VeganVegetarian

Product details

Labels & certifications
VegetarianVegan
Sold in
United Kingdom
Barcode
29137770

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in No Pork Streaky Bacon?

No Pork Streaky Bacon contains 199 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in No Pork Streaky Bacon?

No Pork Streaky Bacon has 1.2 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is No Pork Streaky Bacon healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Is No Pork Streaky Bacon vegan?

Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried No Pork Streaky Bacon? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meat analogues

View all →

More from Marks & Spencer

View all →