View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Fondant d'érable à tartiner
Fondant d'érable à tartiner by Maple Joe provides 337 kcal per 100 g, with 81.7 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Maple sugars category and comes in a 200 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 337 kcal | 364 −7% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 84.3 g | 87.8 |
| Total sugars | 81.7 g | 84.4 |
| Added sugars | 100 g | 90 +11% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.9 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 25 Maple sugars products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other maple sugars
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Sirop d'érable.
Product details
- Quantity
- 200 g
- Labels & certifications
- VegetarianVegan
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3088541002780
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Fondant d'érable à tartiner?
Fondant d'érable à tartiner contains 337 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Fondant d'érable à tartiner?
Fondant d'érable à tartiner has 81.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Fondant d'érable à tartiner healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Fondant d'érable à tartiner vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More maple sugars
View all →
NOVA 2 
NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e 
e NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 More from Maple Joe
View all →
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 
d 
NOVA 3 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2