Comparison
Sucre d'érable vs Fondant d'érable à tartiner
Overall, Fondant d'érable à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre d'érable | Fondant d'érable à tartiner |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 337 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 100 g | 81.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fondant d'érable à tartiner has 18% less sugar (81.7 g vs 100 g).
- Fondant d'érable à tartiner has no salt, while Sucre d'érable has 0.4 g.
Ingredients
Sucre d'érable
Not available.
Fondant d'érable à tartiner
Sirop d'érable.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre d'érable or Fondant d'érable à tartiner?
Overall, Fondant d'érable à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre d'érable has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fondant d'érable à tartiner has less sugar: 81.7 g versus 100 g per 100 g.