Comparison
Ahornsiroop vs Sucre d'érable
Overall, Ahornsiroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ahornsiroop | Sucre d'érable |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 333 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 100 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ahornsiroop has 20% fewer calories (268 kcal vs 333 kcal).
- Ahornsiroop has 34% less sugar (66 g vs 100 g).
- Ahornsiroop has no salt, while Sucre d'érable has 0.4 g.
- Ahornsiroop has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ahornsiroop
100% ahornsiroop van biologische oorsprong.
Sucre d'érable
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ahornsiroop or Sucre d'érable?
Overall, Ahornsiroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ahornsiroop has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ahornsiroop has less sugar: 66 g versus 100 g per 100 g.