View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés
Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés by Citadelle provides 360 kcal per 100 g, with 100 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 19% more sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Maple sugars category and comes in a 250 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 5g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 360 kcal | 18 kcal | 364 | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 100 g | 5 g | 2% | 87.8 +14% |
| Total sugars | 100 g | 5 g | 84.4 +19% | |
| Added sugars | 100 g | 5 g | 10% | 90 +11% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 4.9 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 25 Maple sugars products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other maple sugars
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
100% sirop d'érable
Product details
- Quantity
- 250 g
- Serving size
- 5g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 0055526312793
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés?
Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés contains 360 kcal per 100 g and about 18 kcal per serving (5g).
How much sugar is in Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés?
Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés has 100 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés healthy?
It is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
d 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 More maple sugars
View all →
NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
e 
e NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2
d NOVA 2 
