Comparison

Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés vs Fondant d'érable à tartiner

Overall, Fondant d'érable à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés

Citadelle · 250 g

NOVA 2

Better choice

Fondant d'érable à tartiner

Maple Joe · 200 g

e NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Sucre d'érable 100% pur gran...	Fondant d'érable à tartiner
Nutri-Score	—	e
NOVA group	2	2
Calories	360 kcal	337 kcal
Fat	0 g	0 g
Saturated fat	—	0 g
Sugars	100 g	81.7 g
Salt	—	0 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	0 g	0 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Fondant d'érable à tartiner has 18% less sugar (81.7 g vs 100 g).

Ingredients

Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés

100% sirop d'érable

Fondant d'érable à tartiner

Sirop d'érable.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucre d'érable 100% pur granulés or Fondant d'érable à tartiner?

Overall, Fondant d'érable à tartiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fondant d'érable à tartiner has fewer calories: 337 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fondant d'érable à tartiner has less sugar: 81.7 g versus 100 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre d'érable fin vs Fondant d'érable à tarti... Ahornsiroop vs Fondant d'érable à tarti... Sucre d'érable vs Fondant d'érable à tarti... Sucre d'érable 100% pur... vs Ahorn Sucre d'érable 100% pur... vs Ahorn Fondant d'érable à tarti... vs Ahorn Fondant d'érable à tarti... vs Ahorn Sucre d'érable 100% pur... vs Sucre d'érable bio (pépi...