Nutrition report ready

Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E NOVA 4

View details

Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ

in Desserts Barcode 0027000220214
Bad nutritional quality
Ultra-processed food

Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ provides 677 kcal per 100 g, with 35.5 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 21% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Desserts category. Contains: milk, soybeans.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
58.1 g · High
Saturated fat
45.2 g · High
Sugars
35.5 g · High
Salt
0.2 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 2 tbsp (31 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 677 kcal 210 kcal 292 +131%
Total fat 58.1 g 18 g 23% 14.2 +307%
Saturated fat 45.2 g 14 g 70% 8 +468%
Carbohydrates 41.9 g 13 g 5% 40.5
Total sugars 35.5 g 11 g 29.3 +21%
Added sugarsUSDA 35.5 g 11 g 22% 17.1 +108%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0 g 0% 1.6 −100%
Protein 0 g 0 g 0% 4.9 −100%
Salt 0.2 g 0 g 0.8 −81%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3366 Desserts products on Foodmetria.

Serving size and added sugars from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from September 2025. Other values: Open Food Facts.

Nutrition claims check

Claims its numbers support

Low sodium
64 mg sodium per 100 g (EU: no more than 120 mg per 100 g)

Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.

Compared with other desserts

Calories higher 5%
Sugars higher 28%
Salt lower 26%
Saturated fat higher 1%
Protein top 100%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Hydrogenated Coconut Oil, Sugar, Soybean Oil, Less than 2% of: Soy Lecithin, Salt, Dehydrated Butter, Yellow #5 Lake, Buttermilk Powder, Yellow 6 Lake, Red 40 Lake, Blue 1 Lake, Butter Oil, Natural and Artificial Flavors, Molasses, Caramel Color. CONTAINS: MILK SOY.

Palm oil freeNot vegan
Allergens
MilkSoybeans

Additives 7

Moderate overexposure risk
Moderate overexposure risk
E322 - Lecithins
Antioxidant
E322i - Lecithin
Antioxidant

Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.

Regulatory status of its additives

How the US, individual states and the EU treat additives found in this product's ingredient list.

United States

FDA asks to phase out E129 · E102 · E110 · E133

Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Blue 1 (E133) are among six petroleum-based dyes FDA is asking manufacturers to remove by the end of 2027. The phase-out is voluntary: the dyes remain approved.

California

Barred from California public schools E129 · E102 · E110 · E133

The California School Food Safety Act (AB 2316) bars Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Blue 1 (E133) from food served or sold in public schools from December 31, 2027.

West Virginia

Barred from West Virginia school meals E129 · E102 · E110 · E133

West Virginia HB 2354 has barred Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Blue 1 (E133) from school nutrition programs since August 1, 2025. A statewide ban due January 1, 2028 is on hold under a preliminary injunction (December 23, 2025) while the state appeals.

European Union

Warning label required in the EU E102 · E110 · E129

In the EU, food containing Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Red 40 (E129) must state that it "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children."

What these additives are and what the research says: Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1.

Additives are detected from the ingredient list by Open Food Facts and may be incomplete or out of date. Regulatory status checked October 6, 2026; rules are changing quickly. Not legal advice — always check the package label.

Product details

Serving size
2 tbsp (31 g)
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0027000220214

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ?

Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ contains 677 kcal per 100 g and about 210 kcal per serving (2 tbsp (31 g)).

How much sugar is in Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ?

Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ has 35.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Is Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ vegan?

Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.

What allergens does Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ contain?

According to the label data it contains: Milk, Soybeans. Recipes change — always check the package label.

Does Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ contain additives restricted in the US or the EU?

Its ingredient list includes Red 40 (E129), Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Blue 1 (E133). FDA is asking manufacturers to stop using them by the end of 2027 (voluntarily); California bars them from public schools from December 31, 2027; West Virginia bars them from school meals; the EU requires a warning label on food with Yellow 5 (E102), Yellow 6 (E110) and Red 40 (E129). Recipes change — check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Butterscotch Cone Coating, #10 can, 110 OZ? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More desserts

View all →