Nutrition report ready

Basturökt Skinka

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Svea product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Basturökt Skinka

by Svea in Hams Barcode 7340023809369
Poor nutritional quality

Basturökt Skinka by Svea provides 98 kcal per 100 g, with 0.8 g of sugars and 18 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Hams category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
2.3 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.9 g · Low
Sugars
0.8 g · Low
Salt
2.1 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 100 g

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 98 kcal 98 kcal 169 −42%
Total fat 2.3 g 2.3 g 3% 8.1 −72%
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.9 g 5% 3 −70%
Carbohydrates 2 g 2 g 1% 1.5 +32%
Total sugars 0.8 g 0.8 g 0.8 −5%
Protein 18 g 18 g 36% 22.4 −20%
Salt 2.1 g 2.1 g 3.1 −33%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1904 Hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other hams

Calories lower 6%
Sugars higher 38%
Salt lower 42%
Saturated fat lower 15%
Protein top 84%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Serving size
100 g
Sold in
Sweden
Barcode
7340023809369

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Basturökt Skinka?

Basturökt Skinka contains 98 kcal per 100 g and about 98 kcal per serving (100 g).

How much sugar is in Basturökt Skinka?

Basturökt Skinka has 0.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Basturökt Skinka healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated May 14, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Basturökt Skinka? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More hams

View all →