Product 8410320077958

by Campofrio in Hams Barcode 8410320077958
Average nutritional quality

Product 8410320077958 by Campofrio provides 91 kcal per 100 g, with 1.3 g of sugars and 18 g of protein. That is 55% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Hams category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
1.5 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.6 g · Low
Sugars
1.3 g · Low
Salt
1.9 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 100 g

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 91 kcal 91 kcal 169 −46%
Total fat 1.5 g 1.5 g 2% 8.1 −82%
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.6 g 3% 3 −80%
Carbohydrates 1.3 g 1.3 g 0% 1.5 −14%
Total sugars 1.3 g 1.3 g 0.8 +55%
Protein 18 g 18 g 36% 22.4 −20%
Salt 1.9 g 1.9 g 3.1 −38%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1893 Hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other hams

Calories lower 3%
Sugars higher 14%
Salt lower 21%
Saturated fat lower 5%
Protein top 84%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Serving size
100 g
Labels & certifications
New recipeNo lactose
Sold in
France, Spain
Barcode
8410320077958

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Product 8410320077958?

Product 8410320077958 contains 91 kcal per 100 g and about 91 kcal per serving (100 g).

How much sugar is in Product 8410320077958?

Product 8410320077958 has 1.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Product 8410320077958 healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 2, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Product 8410320077958? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More hams

View all →

More from Campofrio

View all →