Zure haring met zoetstof vs Matjesfilets
Overall, Zure haring met zoetstof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zure haring met zoetstof | Matjesfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 228 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 18.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 6.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 15.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard, Mosterdzaad | Fish, Hering |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 13% less fat (16 g vs 18.4 g).
- Matjesfilets has 22% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 4 g).
- Matjesfilets has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 69% less salt (2 g vs 6.4 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Zure haring met zoetstof lists: Mustard, Mosterdzaad.
- Only Matjesfilets lists: Hering.
Ingredients
Zure haring met zoetstof
Haring (_vis_) (88% van het uitlekgewicht), opgiet (zout, natuurazijn, voedingszuur: melkzuur, natuurlijk aroma, zoetstof: sucralose), ui, _mosterdzaad_. pimentkorrels, witte peperkorrels, gedroogde wortel.
Matjesfilets
97% Matjesfilets nordische Art (_Hering_, Salz, Traubenzucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumbenzoat), Rapsöl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zure haring met zoetstof or Matjesfilets?
Overall, Zure haring met zoetstof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zure haring met zoetstof has fewer calories: 211 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matjesfilets has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.