Comparison

Filets de hareng marines artisanaux vs Matjesfilets

Overall, Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de hareng marines art...Matjesfilets
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 172 kcal 228 kcal
Fat 13 g 18.4 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 3.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.1 g
Salt 2.5 g 6.4 g
Fiber 0.1 g —
Protein 13 g 15.6 g
Additives13
AllergensFishFish, Hering

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has 25% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 228 kcal).
  • Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has 29% less fat (13 g vs 18.4 g).
  • Matjesfilets has 30% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Matjesfilets has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has 61% less salt (2.5 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Matjesfilets has 17% more protein (15.6 g vs 13 g).
  • Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Filets de hareng marines artisanaux is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Matjesfilets lists: Hering.

Ingredients

Filets de hareng marines artisanaux

hareng 54%, eau, vinaigre, oignon, acide acétique, sel

Matjesfilets

97% Matjesfilets nordische Art (_Hering_, Salz, Traubenzucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumbenzoat), Rapsöl

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de hareng marines artisanaux or Matjesfilets?

Overall, Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Matjesfilets has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons