Sursild vs Matjesfilets
Overall, Sursild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sursild | Matjesfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 215 kcal | 228 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 18.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 15.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Hering |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sursild has 57% less fat (8 g vs 18.4 g).
- Sursild has 35% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Matjesfilets has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 25 g).
- Sursild has 56% less salt (2.8 g vs 6.4 g).
- Matjesfilets has 53% more protein (15.6 g vs 7.3 g).
- Only Matjesfilets lists: Hering.
Ingredients
Sursild
Marinert _sild_ (45%), sukker, løk (18%), vann, salt, eddik, pepper, aroma, korerveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat).
Matjesfilets
97% Matjesfilets nordische Art (_Hering_, Salz, Traubenzucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumbenzoat), Rapsöl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sursild or Matjesfilets?
Overall, Sursild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sursild has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matjesfilets has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 25 g per 100 g.