Sursild vs Senaps Sill
Overall, Sursild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sursild | Senaps Sill |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 215 kcal | 249 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 8 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sursild has 14% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Sursild has 50% less fat (8 g vs 16 g).
- Sursild has 33% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3 g).
- Senaps Sill has 36% less sugar (16 g vs 25 g).
- Senaps Sill has 14% more protein (8.5 g vs 7.3 g).
- Only Senaps Sill lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Sursild
Marinert _sild_ (45%), sukker, løk (18%), vann, salt, eddik, pepper, aroma, korerveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat).
Senaps Sill
_SILL_, socker, vatten, rapsolja, _SENAP_ (12%) (vatten, _SENAPsfrö_, socker, ättika, salt, kryddor (bl.a. koriander, kanel)), salt, _SENAPsfrö_, syra (ättiksyra), konserveringsmedel (natriumbensoat, kaliumsorbat), förtjockningsmedel (xantangummi), färgämne (betakaroten, sockerkulör (E150c)).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sursild or Senaps Sill?
Overall, Sursild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sursild has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Senaps Sill has less sugar: 16 g versus 25 g per 100 g.