Sursild vs Zure haring met zoetstof
Overall, Zure haring met zoetstof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sursild | Zure haring met zoetstof |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 215 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Mustard, Mosterdzaad |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sursild has 50% less fat (8 g vs 16 g).
- Sursild has 50% less saturated fat (2 g vs 4 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 25 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 29% less salt (2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 54% more protein (16 g vs 7.3 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Zure haring met zoetstof lists: Mustard, Mosterdzaad.
Ingredients
Sursild
Marinert _sild_ (45%), sukker, løk (18%), vann, salt, eddik, pepper, aroma, korerveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat).
Zure haring met zoetstof
Haring (_vis_) (88% van het uitlekgewicht), opgiet (zout, natuurazijn, voedingszuur: melkzuur, natuurlijk aroma, zoetstof: sucralose), ui, _mosterdzaad_. pimentkorrels, witte peperkorrels, gedroogde wortel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sursild or Zure haring met zoetstof?
Overall, Zure haring met zoetstof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zure haring met zoetstof has fewer calories: 211 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zure haring met zoetstof has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 25 g per 100 g.