Filets de hareng marines artisanaux vs Zure haring met zoetstof
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de hareng marines art... | Zure haring met zoetstof |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Mustard, Mosterdzaad |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has 18% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 211 kcal).
- Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has 19% less fat (13 g vs 16 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 20% less salt (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 84% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Zure haring met zoetstof has 19% more protein (16 g vs 13 g).
- Filets de hareng marines artisanaux is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Zure haring met zoetstof lists: Mustard, Mosterdzaad.
Ingredients
Filets de hareng marines artisanaux
hareng 54%, eau, vinaigre, oignon, acide acétique, sel
Zure haring met zoetstof
Haring (_vis_) (88% van het uitlekgewicht), opgiet (zout, natuurazijn, voedingszuur: melkzuur, natuurlijk aroma, zoetstof: sucralose), ui, _mosterdzaad_. pimentkorrels, witte peperkorrels, gedroogde wortel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de hareng marines artisanaux or Zure haring met zoetstof?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de hareng marines artisanaux has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.