Comparison

Željezo+ vitamin c vs High Protein Coffee Drink

Overall, High Protein Coffee Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientŽeljezo+ vitamin cHigh Protein Coffee Drink
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 75 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 4.2 g
Salt 19 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0.2 g
Protein 0.5 g 7.7 g
Additives83
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • High Protein Coffee Drink has 35% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 75 kcal).
  • High Protein Coffee Drink has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • High Protein Coffee Drink has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Željezo+ vitamin c has 74% less sugar (1.1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • High Protein Coffee Drink has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 19 g).
  • High Protein Coffee Drink has 94% more protein (7.7 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only High Protein Coffee Drink lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Željezo+ vitamin c

Kiselina: limunska kiselina, regulator kiselosti: natrijev hidrogenkarbonat, punilo: sorbitol, aroma, kukuruzni škrob, prah cikle, L-askorbinska kiselina (vitamin C), sladila: natrijev ciklamat i natrijev saharinat, željezov Il laktat, bojilo: riboflavin. Veganski proizvod.

High Protein Coffee Drink

60% białka mleka, 20% kawa, 19% mleko odtłuszczone, stabilizatory: węglany sodu, fosforany potasu; substancje słodzące: sukraloza, acesulfam K; laktaza

FAQ

Which is healthier: Željezo+ vitamin c or High Protein Coffee Drink?

Overall, High Protein Coffee Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

High Protein Coffee Drink has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Željezo+ vitamin c has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons