Acerola Bio Saft vs High Protein Coffee Drink
Overall, Acerola Bio Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acerola Bio Saft | High Protein Coffee Drink |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acerola Bio Saft has 63% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 49 kcal).
- Acerola Bio Saft has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.2 g).
- High Protein Coffee Drink has 94% more protein (7.7 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Acerola Bio Saft lists: None.
- Only High Protein Coffee Drink lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Acerola Bio Saft
Suc d'acérola (Malpighia glabra / fruits) tiré des fruits frais issus de l'agriculture biologique.
High Protein Coffee Drink
60% białka mleka, 20% kawa, 19% mleko odtłuszczone, stabilizatory: węglany sodu, fosforany potasu; substancje słodzące: sukraloza, acesulfam K; laktaza
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acerola Bio Saft or High Protein Coffee Drink?
Overall, Acerola Bio Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acerola Bio Saft has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acerola Bio Saft has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.