Acerola Bio Saft vs Protein Shake Raspberry
Overall, Acerola Bio Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acerola Bio Saft | Protein Shake Raspberry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 19 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 27 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acerola Bio Saft has 95% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 348 kcal).
- Acerola Bio Saft has no fat, while Protein Shake Raspberry has 7.8 g.
- Acerola Bio Saft has no saturated fat, while Protein Shake Raspberry has 0.6 g.
- Acerola Bio Saft has 97% less sugar (0.5 g vs 19 g).
- Protein Shake Raspberry has 98% more protein (33 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Acerola Bio Saft lists: None.
- Only Protein Shake Raspberry lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Acerola Bio Saft
Suc d'acérola (Malpighia glabra / fruits) tiré des fruits frais issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Protein Shake Raspberry
mandelproteinpulver, himbeerpulver, Dattelpulver
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acerola Bio Saft or Protein Shake Raspberry?
Overall, Acerola Bio Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acerola Bio Saft has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acerola Bio Saft has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 19 g per 100 g.