Acerola Bio Saft vs Željezo+ vitamin c
Overall, Acerola Bio Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acerola Bio Saft | Željezo+ vitamin c |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 19 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 8 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acerola Bio Saft has 76% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 75 kcal).
- Acerola Bio Saft has no fat, while Željezo+ vitamin c has 0.5 g.
- Acerola Bio Saft has no saturated fat, while Željezo+ vitamin c has 0.4 g.
- Acerola Bio Saft has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Acerola Bio Saft has 100% less salt (0 g vs 19 g).
- Acerola Bio Saft has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Acerola Bio Saft lists: None.
Ingredients
Acerola Bio Saft
Suc d'acérola (Malpighia glabra / fruits) tiré des fruits frais issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Željezo+ vitamin c
Kiselina: limunska kiselina, regulator kiselosti: natrijev hidrogenkarbonat, punilo: sorbitol, aroma, kukuruzni škrob, prah cikle, L-askorbinska kiselina (vitamin C), sladila: natrijev ciklamat i natrijev saharinat, željezov Il laktat, bojilo: riboflavin. Veganski proizvod.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acerola Bio Saft or Željezo+ vitamin c?
Overall, Acerola Bio Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acerola Bio Saft has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acerola Bio Saft has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.