High Protein Coffee Drink vs Protein Shake Raspberry
Overall, High Protein Coffee Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | High Protein Coffee Drink | Protein Shake Raspberry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 19 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 27 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- High Protein Coffee Drink has 86% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 348 kcal).
- High Protein Coffee Drink has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 7.8 g).
- High Protein Coffee Drink has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- High Protein Coffee Drink has 78% less sugar (4.2 g vs 19 g).
- Protein Shake Raspberry has 99% more fiber (27 g vs 0.2 g).
- Protein Shake Raspberry has 77% more protein (33 g vs 7.7 g).
- Protein Shake Raspberry is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only High Protein Coffee Drink lists: Milk.
- Only Protein Shake Raspberry lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
High Protein Coffee Drink
60% białka mleka, 20% kawa, 19% mleko odtłuszczone, stabilizatory: węglany sodu, fosforany potasu; substancje słodzące: sukraloza, acesulfam K; laktaza
Protein Shake Raspberry
mandelproteinpulver, himbeerpulver, Dattelpulver
FAQ
Which is healthier: High Protein Coffee Drink or Protein Shake Raspberry?
Overall, High Protein Coffee Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
High Protein Coffee Drink has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
High Protein Coffee Drink has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 19 g per 100 g.