Wilde zalmfilets vs Surimi sticks
Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wilde zalmfilets | Surimi sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 99 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Fish | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wilde zalmfilets has 19% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 122 kcal).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 49% less fat (2.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has no sugar, while Surimi sticks has 2.9 g.
- Wilde zalmfilets has 72% less salt (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 65% more protein (19 g vs 6.7 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Wilde zalmfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Wilde zalmfilets lists: Fish.
- Only Surimi sticks lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Wilde zalmfilets
Pacifische zalm
Surimi sticks
water, witvis, zetmeel, tarwe, eiwit-eiwit, plantaardige olie, suiker, aroma, zout, stabilisator (E420, E452, E451, E450), kleurstof (E120), kleurstof (E160c)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wilde zalmfilets or Surimi sticks?
Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wilde zalmfilets has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wilde zalmfilets has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.