Comparison
Wilde zalmfilets vs Malse Zalm Filet
Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wilde zalmfilets | Malse Zalm Filet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 99 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wilde zalmfilets has 45% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 77% less fat (2.5 g vs 11 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 75% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet has 83% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Wilde zalmfilets
Pacifische zalm
Malse Zalm Filet
Zalm.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wilde zalmfilets or Malse Zalm Filet?
Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wilde zalmfilets has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wilde zalmfilets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Iglo Vissticks vs Malse Zalm Filet
Tonijn olie vs Malse Zalm Filet
Malse Zalm Filet vs Vissticks
Fish Cuisine Italiano vs Malse Zalm Filet
Malse Zalm Filet vs Surimi sticks
Jalapeño flavor plant-ba... vs Wilde zalmfilets
Jalapeño flavor plant-ba... vs Malse Zalm Filet
Fish Cuisine Italiano vs Wilde zalmfilets