Comparison

Jalapeño flavor plant-based burgers vs Wilde zalmfilets

Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJalapeño flavor plant-based...Wilde zalmfilets
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 188 kcal 99 kcal
Fat 11 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.6 g
Fiber 1.5 g 0 g
Protein 16 g 19 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wilde zalmfilets has 47% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 188 kcal).
  • Wilde zalmfilets has 77% less fat (2.5 g vs 11 g).
  • Wilde zalmfilets has 81% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Wilde zalmfilets has no sugar, while Jalapeño flavor plant-based burgers has 0.6 g.
  • Jalapeño flavor plant-based burgers has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Wilde zalmfilets has 16% more protein (19 g vs 16 g).
  • Wilde zalmfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Wilde zalmfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Wilde zalmfilets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Jalapeño flavor plant-based burgers

Water, erwteneiwit* (15%), raapzaadolie, aroma, rijsteiwit, kokosolie, gedroogde gist, conserveermiddel (kaliumlactaat), azijn, stabilisatoren (methylcellulose, calciumchloride), aardappelzetmeel, zout, appelextract, kleurstof (bietenrood), geconcentreerd granaatappelsap, kaliumzout..

Wilde zalmfilets

Pacifische zalm

FAQ

Which is healthier: Jalapeño flavor plant-based burgers or Wilde zalmfilets?

Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wilde zalmfilets has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wilde zalmfilets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons