Comparison
Gerookte zalm vs Wilde zalmfilets
Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gerookte zalm | Wilde zalmfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 207 kcal | 99 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 26.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Zalm | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wilde zalmfilets has 52% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 207 kcal).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 82% less fat (2.5 g vs 14 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 98% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 24 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has 98% less salt (0.6 g vs 26.9 g).
- Wilde zalmfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Wilde zalmfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Gerookte zalm lists: Zalm.
Ingredients
Gerookte zalm
_zalm_, zout, azijn, rook
Wilde zalmfilets
Pacifische zalm
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gerookte zalm or Wilde zalmfilets?
Overall, Wilde zalmfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wilde zalmfilets has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gerookte zalm has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.