Comparison
Gerookte zalm vs Vissticks
Overall, Vissticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gerookte zalm | Vissticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 207 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 26.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Zalm | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vissticks has 36% less fat (9 g vs 14 g).
- Vissticks has 97% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 24 g).
- Gerookte zalm has no sugar, while Vissticks has 0.8 g.
- Vissticks has 97% less salt (0.8 g vs 26.9 g).
- Vissticks has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
- Gerookte zalm has 35% more protein (20 g vs 13 g).
- Vissticks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gerookte zalm lists: Zalm.
- Only Vissticks lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Gerookte zalm
_zalm_, zout, azijn, rook
Vissticks
65% koolvis, tarwebloem, raapolie, water, aardappelzetmeel, zout, gist, specerijen,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gerookte zalm or Vissticks?
Overall, Vissticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vissticks has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gerookte zalm has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.