Iglo Vissticks vs Vissticks
Overall, Iglo Vissticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iglo Vissticks | Vissticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 220 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 12.1 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vissticks has 14% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 220 kcal).
- Iglo Vissticks has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Iglo Vissticks
Alaska koolvis 58%, paneermeel 20% (tarwebloem, water, paprikapoeder, gist, kurkuma), koolzaadolie, water, tarwebloem, aardappelzetmeel, zout. Ondanks zorgvuldig fileren kan onbedoeld een graatje in de vis achterblijven. **Referentie-inname van een gemiddelde volwassene (8400kJ/2000 kcal). De waarden per portie worden verkregen door 140 g diepvries product (5 Vissticks) in de oven te bereiden. Een portie bevat 163 mg omega 3 % (DHA + EPA).
Vissticks
65% koolvis, tarwebloem, raapolie, water, aardappelzetmeel, zout, gist, specerijen,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iglo Vissticks or Vissticks?
Overall, Iglo Vissticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vissticks has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 220 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vissticks has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.