Comparison

Vissticks vs Surimi sticks

Overall, Vissticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVissticksSurimi sticks
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 190 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 9 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 2.9 g
Salt 0.8 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0.8 g —
Protein 13 g 6.7 g
Additives06
AllergensFish, GlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Surimi sticks has 36% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 190 kcal).
  • Surimi sticks has 46% less fat (4.9 g vs 9 g).
  • Surimi sticks has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Vissticks has 72% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Vissticks has 62% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Vissticks has 48% more protein (13 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Vissticks has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Vissticks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Vissticks lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Vissticks

65% koolvis, tarwebloem, raapolie, water, aardappelzetmeel, zout, gist, specerijen,

Surimi sticks

water, witvis, zetmeel, tarwe, eiwit-eiwit, plantaardige olie, suiker, aroma, zout, stabilisator (E420, E452, E451, E450), kleurstof (E120), kleurstof (E160c)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vissticks or Surimi sticks?

Overall, Vissticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Surimi sticks has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vissticks has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons