Malse Zalm Filet vs Surimi sticks
Overall, Malse Zalm Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Malse Zalm Filet | Surimi sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Fish | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Surimi sticks has 32% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Surimi sticks has 55% less fat (4.9 g vs 11 g).
- Surimi sticks has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet has no sugar, while Surimi sticks has 2.9 g.
- Malse Zalm Filet has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet has 67% more protein (20 g vs 6.7 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Malse Zalm Filet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Malse Zalm Filet lists: Fish.
- Only Surimi sticks lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Malse Zalm Filet
Zalm.
Surimi sticks
water, witvis, zetmeel, tarwe, eiwit-eiwit, plantaardige olie, suiker, aroma, zout, stabilisator (E420, E452, E451, E450), kleurstof (E120), kleurstof (E160c)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Malse Zalm Filet or Surimi sticks?
Overall, Malse Zalm Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Surimi sticks has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malse Zalm Filet has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.