Fish Cuisine Italiano vs Malse Zalm Filet
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fish Cuisine Italiano | Malse Zalm Filet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 78 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fish Cuisine Italiano has 56% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 179 kcal).
- Fish Cuisine Italiano has 78% less fat (2.4 g vs 11 g).
- Fish Cuisine Italiano has 50% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet has no sugar, while Fish Cuisine Italiano has 1.2 g.
- Malse Zalm Filet has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Fish Cuisine Italiano has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet has 45% more protein (20 g vs 11 g).
- Malse Zalm Filet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fish Cuisine Italiano lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fish Cuisine Italiano
Alaska koolvis 41%, tomaten 23%, uien, paprika 5,4%, kwarkbereiding 4,9% (kwark (melk), magere yoghurt (melk)), water, Edammer kaas (melk), mozzarella (melk) 2,0%, zetmeel (rijst. aardappel), koolzaadolie, zout, kruiden (basilicum 0,45%), knoflook, yoghurtpoeder (melk), specerijen, uienpoeder. Ondanks zorgvuldig fileren kan onbedoeld een graatje in de vis achterblijven.
Malse Zalm Filet
Zalm.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fish Cuisine Italiano or Malse Zalm Filet?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fish Cuisine Italiano has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malse Zalm Filet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.