Comparison

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon vs Sardines in Sunflower Oil

Overall, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWild Alaskan Pink SalmonSardines in Sunflower Oil
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 94 kcal 320 kcal
Fat 5.9 g 26.8 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 6.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 17.5 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, MilkFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 71% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 320 kcal).
  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 78% less fat (5.9 g vs 26.8 g).
  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 72% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 88% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 13% more protein (20 g vs 17.5 g).
  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

PINK SALMON. CONTAINS SALMON.

Sardines in Sunflower Oil

Sardines (Sardinops Melanostictus) (FISH) (67.2%), Sunflower Oil, Water, Salt. 5

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon or Sardines in Sunflower Oil?

Overall, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons